Briefs · I · Ideatives Inc. · Updated
Checking agent code is the slow part.
Developers say AI agents fully write about 47% of their code (JetBrains Developer Ecosystem Survey 2026, 15,000+ developers, self-reported), while Faros AI's 2026 telemetry from 22,000 developers shows median time in PR review up 441.5% from teams' lowest- to highest-AI-use quarters.
JetBrains Developer Ecosystem Survey 2026 · 15,000+ developers, May–July 2026
In this brief
What happens to code review as AI use rises?
In Faros AI's 2026 telemetry (22,000 developers, vendor data), teams' highest-AI-use quarters showed 66.2% more epics per developer than their lowest, but median time in PR review was 441.5% higher and deployments per week 11.7% lower. This is a correlation, not a measured cause.
Where the code review bottleneck is
96%
Of developers don't fully trust that AI code is functionally correct. Only 48% say they always check it.
Sonar, January 2026 · 1,100+ developers · vendor
+199.6%
Average increase in time spent in PR review; +441.5% at the median.
Faros telemetry, 2026 · 22,000 developers · vendor
66%
Of developers cite "AI solutions that are almost right, but not quite."
Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025 · 49,020 respondents
Where the time goes
Agent
Write code
PRs are 51.3% larger and edit 59.7% more files.
Faros, 2026
Human
Wait for review
Median time to first review: +156.6%.
Faros, 2026
Human
In review
Median time in review: +441.5%.
Faros, 2026
Outcome
Merged unreviewed
PRs merged without any review: +31.3%.
Faros, 2026
Outcome
Deploys
Deployments per week: −11.7%, in the ~10% of teams that measure it.
Faros, 2026
Ideatives’ view: the cost has moved from writing code to judging it, including deciding what to leave alone. No source measures this directly.
What to do
- Write down the problem and the "do not touch" list before an agent starts.
- Cap PR size. Require a named human reviewer for agent-written changes.
- Track review time and rework instead of lines produced.
Questions
How much code do AI agents write in 2026?
Developers say agents fully write about 47% of their code, according to the JetBrains Developer Ecosystem Survey 2026 (15,000+ developers, self-reported).
Does AI slow down code review?
In Faros AI's 2026 telemetry, median time in PR review was 441.5% higher in teams' highest-AI-use quarters than in their lowest. It is vendor data and shows correlation only.
Do developers trust AI-written code?
In Sonar's January 2026 survey of 1,100+ developers, 96% said they don't fully trust that AI-generated code is functionally correct, and 48% said they always check it.
Sources
- JetBrains Research, How Much Code Do Developers Really Let Agents Write?, August 2026. 15,000+ respondents. Self-report; averages bracket midpoints, and its three shares sum to about 112%. JetBrains sells AI coding tools.
- Sonar, State of Code press release and blog, January 8, 2026. 1,100+ respondents. Puts AI-generated or assisted code at 42%, a broader measure than JetBrains'. Sonar sells code verification.
- Faros, AI Engineering Report 2026. 22,000 developers, 4,000 teams, analysis as of March 2026. Telemetry; compares each team's own quarters. Faros sells engineering analytics.
- Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025, AI section. 49,020 respondents. Only 14.1% used AI agents daily at work.
- Every source here sells something related to AI coding. No independent or academic source was found.
Licenses and reuse
Ideatives’ work is licensed below. Figures from each source remain under that source's terms; each is cited with attribution.
- Ideatives Inc.: text, charts and data compilations on this page, excluding quotations and source figures, CC BY 4.0. Credit "Ideatives Inc." with a link to this page.
- Faros AI: Terms not stated; cited with attribution
- JetBrains: All rights reserved; non-commercial view/print only
- Sonar (SonarSource): All rights reserved; cited with attribution
- Stack Overflow: ODbL (survey data); page text terms not stated